Resolution 1099 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Resolution No. /099 Page 78 � � 24. Johnson' s formal license application in February, 1979 caused formal review of his development plan. - After deep study by the Council, reviews by the City - staff, and comments by the public at the public hearing, the Council decided th at the Johnson plan was too ambitious given the needs of the area and the environ- mental constraints of the site. Certain technical difficulties or discrepancies were also found in the plan. 25. The Council conceptually disapproved the scope : of the Johnson plan in Resolution 1005, and called for th is Resolution to set forth all the f indings in th e � record and the conclusions evident and made from those findings. 26. The conceptual denial apparently caused Johnson to abandon his involvement with the property. . � 27. McCleary thereafter notif ied the City that he would be responsible for the property. The City staff then notified McCleary that the 1979 dock license for Stubbs Bay was not in order. As of April 16, 1979, McCleary had not returned a dock _ license application although he had been sent the � form in December, 1978 along with all other 1978 Marina licenses. . 28.. McCleary has proceeded to advertise dock space for rent and to make arrangements for operation in- •- 1979 despite �clear City direction that a ,proper license application and physical improvements need be made before a 1979 license would be issued. In particular, no attempt has been made to correct the � existing dock structure `condition or setback viola- tions. . 29. For the record, since the Johnson involvement began in 1978,. notice of every Council meeting involv- ' ing the Marina Property, including copies of all � documentation and staff reports supplied to� the Council for their review, has been given to all interested � . parties alike, including Johnson, McCleary, McCleary' s . . attorney of recoxd, Keiran, and Keiran' s attorney of record. �