Laserfiche WebLink
/ <br /> Resolution No. /D 5� . <br /> Page 50 <br /> � ' <br /> c) The Report then recom*nended: ". . that the present policy <br /> - of preserving lakes and marshes from filling be continued. �, <br /> It is further recommended that the future construction of . <br /> storm sewers be minimized to those required to alleviate <br /> local problems . Storm runoff from the watershed should <br /> � be encouraged to flow over marshes , not through them in <br /> conduits or around them. " <br /> "An attempt should be made to locate those areas adjacent <br /> to marshes which may be flooded intermittantly because of <br /> increased runoff caused by future developments . These <br /> areas should be resei-ved from further development just `as • <br /> though they were a portion of the adjacent marsh. " <br /> 2. Preliminary Engineering Report, Sanitary Sewers in the Stubbs . <br /> � Bay Area, November, 1975, by then �ity Engineer, Mc�ombs-Knutson <br /> Associates. <br /> Ground water sampling was done in 1974 which ".•. . . showed high <br /> • chloride and surfactant concentrations that are indictive of <br /> contamination. The samples from the unnamed tributary to Stubbs <br /> Bay showed high Fecal �oliform counts , which are indictive of <br /> pollution from individual sewage disposal systems (drainfield <br /> overflow) . " The report studied the feasibility of sewering the <br /> Tonka, �restview and East Lake Street areas with a collection <br /> system. 'Itao alternative disposal mea'ns were investigated. An <br /> on-site drainfield near Bayside Road �and Leaf Street or a <br /> connection to .a ,planr�ed iriterceptor sewer farther away. <br /> "The recommendation of the" 1974 and 1975 report(s) was that <br /> sanitary sewer facilities should be installed to prevent the <br /> continued contamination of the ground water and Lake Minnetonka'' <br /> from point source pollution. � ` <br /> `� � <br /> 3. Dr. John Woods , Director of the University of Minnesota Gray <br /> Freshwater Biological Institute evaluated the Johnson application <br /> � for development of the Marina property. His response is attached <br /> as Exhibit CC. � <br /> Dr. Wood' s recommendation based upon environmental impact on Stubbs <br /> Bay was that "Since Stubbs Bay is small and very shal,low, it is <br /> � clear that a multiple dock for large power boats would make the <br /> situation �eutrophic condition of the bay) worse in several respects . " <br />