My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 1095
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 1000 - 1099 (February 27, 1979 - December 11, 1979)
>
Resolution 1095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2015 11:33:49 AM
Creation date
11/12/2015 11:33:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�' ' <br /> � ' Resolution No. 1095 <br /> Page 3 �- <br /> . <br /> • Council finds that the house as designed and proposed by the <br /> applicant, including all necessary driveways, turnarounds, fill, <br /> and appurtenances, can in fact be located at least 75 feet <br /> from the lakeshore line and at least 26 feet from the pond on <br /> the property: , <br /> a. Applicants claim that a location closer to the lake <br /> would reduce direct drainage from the house to the lake <br /> is found to be unjustified in that the roof design , <br /> directs a majority of the water away from the lake, in- <br /> � creasing the lake setback increases the opportunity to <br /> " direct all water away from the lake by appropriate site <br /> grading, and increasing the lake setback increases the <br /> grass and groundcover- area capable of absorbing any <br /> runoff which may be directed toward the lake, all factors <br /> being in keeping with the intent of such setback to <br /> provide adequate storm water filtration and pollution <br /> protection for� Lake Minnetonka. <br /> b. Placing the �house 75 feet from the shoreline will <br /> not materially alter any view of the lake from such <br /> house because of the shoreline configuration, the <br /> location of adjoining houses and the large conifers <br /> lining both property lines. <br /> • c. Placing the house closer to the pond will not materially <br /> affect the apparent distance from the pond and will <br /> not require encroachment on the required 26 foot setback <br /> from the pond. <br /> d. Placing the house where proposed would actually result <br /> in placement ahead of the adjacent house to the east <br /> contrary to the intent of Section 34. 201. <br /> � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the <br /> City of Orono hereby approves issuance of certain variances but denies " <br /> , approval of other requested variances, having the effect of permitting <br /> construction of a single family residence on the subject lot within <br /> the allowable area shown on Exhibit A attached, pursuant to the following: <br /> l. The Council hereby approves lot area and lot width variances <br /> as requested. . � <br /> 2. The Council hereby approves renewal of the side yard setback <br /> . variances as approved for John Nobel in 1978, specifically <br /> 18 foot setback on the west. and 23 foot setback on the east, <br /> noting that this approval is more than requested by Henry <br /> Kingman which allows for flexibility in relocating and/or <br /> redesigning the Kingman proposal without further Council <br /> action required. <br /> • . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.