Resolution 1095 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� : � Resolution No. 1095 Page 2 , • , 5. The applicant proposed installation of a sewage holding tank instead of a septic tank and on-site drainfield treatment area which installation requires a variance from Section 22 . 20 Subdivisions 3 and 4 of the City' s On-Site Sewage Treatment � Code. � 6 . This same lot was the subject of an application for lot area, lot width, side setback and holding tank variances by John Nobel, application #429, which was approved by the Council on December 18, 1978. The Nobel application was based. upon a larger house design and included closer setbacks to the side property lines, but included no request for any lakeshore or hardcover variance. • � 7. In the approval of the Nobel application, and reaffirmed " in the review of this application, the Council finds that the subject lot is a single-separately owned parcel which existed prior "to the effective date of the current LR-lA lot area and lot width requirements and that there is no adjacent vacant land available to increase the 'size of the subject property. • 8. The Council finds that this lot is of similar size and configuration with adjoining and nearby lots which are built upon and that approval of the lot area and lot width variance • request is necessary to preserve a substantial property right for the applicant. 9. The Council finds that because of the narrowness of this lot, approval of side yard setback variances are necessary to alleviate a demonstrated hardship in building on this property, ' that side setbacks as proposed, �or an approved for the Nobel application, are consistent with required side setbacks in other Districts with lot width requirements similar to the actual size of this lot, and that approval of side setback variances would not endanger the public health, safety or welfare. � . 10. The Council finds that installation of a sewage holding tank to service any house on this property is necessary because of the high water table and low ground elevation of the property which conditions preclude installation of a standard drainfield. The Council f.inds that such approval is consistent with the � intent of the On-Site Sewage Treatment Code in such unusual conditions, provided that the tank is properly and frequently � pumped and services according to the street requirements of said Code. 11. The Council finds that the applicant has not presented nor proven any hardship which would justify granting of any • � variance to any lakeshore or wetlands setback, and further the