Laserfiche WebLink
24. <br />Describe the type and amount of solid and/or hazardous wrste Including sludges and <br />ashes that will be generated and the method and location of disposal: <br />None <br />25. <br />Will the project affect: ❑ <br />No ® Yes <br />a. fish or wildlife habitat, or movement of animals? <br />that are officially listed as state endangered, threatened, or of a <br />❑ <br />b. any native species <br />No Yes <br />special concern (animals and/or plants)? <br />If yes, explain (Identify species and describe Impact): <br />a. During construction some fish may be displaced. After construction <br />the <br />docks will provide protective habitat for fish native to the area <br />— bass, <br />2 6. <br />crappies, sunfish <br />Do historical, archaeological or architectural resources exist on or near the project ® <br />No ❑ Yes <br />any <br />site? If yes, explain (show resotrces on a site map and describe impact," <br />27. <br />Will the project cause the Impairment or destruction of: <br />No Yes <br />a. designated park or recreation areas? <br />X <br />No <br />Yes <br />b. prime or unique farmlands? <br />No <br />Yes <br />c. ecologically sensitive areas? <br />No <br />X <br />Yes <br />d. scenic views and vistas? <br />No <br />Yes <br />e. other unique resources (specify)? <br />It yes, explain: <br />d. Boat storage will replace an unbroken view of th_ shoreline on <br />Tanager Lake <br />side. This is not unusual in a genEral development, recreation <br />water body. <br />28e <br />This is viewed as consistent with the lake's recreatAbial use. <br />Indicate the current average daily traffic IADT1. Increase in <br />For each affected road <br />contributed by the project and the directional distributions of traffic. <br />The City of Orono has approved the parking plan. The increased docking <br />of <br />48 boats will attract on an average high -use day 1/3 more traffic <br />to the site. <br />This may involve 16 additional trips to the site. The daily turn -over <br />of site <br />users is probably three times the average high -trip use. <br />A <br />29e <br />Are adequate utilities and public services now available to service the project? If not. ❑ <br />Nu © Yes <br />what additional utilities and/or services will be required? <br />Summary of issues <br />For regul*: EAWs, list the Issues as Identified by "yes" answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these <br />Issues. For scoping EAWs. list known issues, alternatives, and mitigative measures to be addressed in EIS. <br />a. Lessening of scenic views <br />b. Addition of boat traffic thru a narrow channel to Tanager Lake, with <br />possible increased waiting on/near the channel in Tanager Lake. The <br />owner will face the four end slips so that access is opposite of normal <br />channel traffic. <br />c. Added boat storage density in Tanager Lake. The proposal is well within <br />the maximum density allowed under LMCD Code Section 2.05 of one slip per <br />10 feet of frontage. <br />CERTIFICATION BV RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT <br />I hereby certify ths. the information contained its this document Is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that <br />copies of the compiried EAW have been made a%adable to all points on the official EQB dtstttbLtion list <br />Signatu►e&`'�44_ ( .J J< ` ` Dale S.: ; <br />Title — 'T_ < <br />