Laserfiche WebLink
zoning File #1468 <br />November 9, 1989 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Planniriq Commission also directed applicant to work with <br />staff to Pstablish limits on the grading work proposed, and <br />applicant was advised to contact staff to arrange a meeting with <br />the City Engineer. As of this ..r4ting, applicant has not <br />contacted us, but the City Engineer has advised staff that <br />additional detail of the proposed graO4 %g would be needed before <br />a permit could be issued for the grading, if Council choosers to <br />approve the request. The engineer h,s indicated that the <br />pro:osal is conceptually coceptable from a technical standpoint. <br />Also note that ';.re..e is a need for an average la�eshcre <br />setback variance for the proposed addition. All neighboring <br />residences are so distant that the addition will not Encroach on <br />any existing lake views enjoyed by neighboring property owners. <br />Staff Recommendation - <br />Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback <br />variance and the conditional use permit for regrading and <br />retaining i1 construction per the conceptual plan. Such <br />approval should be subject to final detailed plan approval by the <br />City Engineer before a grading permit is issued. <br />Regarding the Lakeshore setback and hardcover variance, <br />staff dce3 ^ot necessarily disaccree with the maj r'ty Planning <br />Commission recommendation, but would note to Counc - I that past <br />approvals of new structure in the 0-75' lone have ir1 most cases <br />been tied to removal of equivalent amounts of bardcover in the 0- <br />75' zone, resulting in no hardcover increase 1'- the zone. Also, <br />additions in the 0-75' zone normally have not been allowed to <br />extend closer to the shoreline han the existing residence. In <br />this case, applicant has indicated that the addition will be <br />58.5' from the shoreline with or Lions of the house already 57' <br />from the shoreline. <br />Council should consider whether the proposed drainage system <br />to direct run-off from the 0-75' zone to the 75-250' zone is <br />justification to grant a hardcover increase. Phis would seem tc. <br />he breaking new ground, ann would be an apparent departure from <br />past Council policy. <br />A draft resolution reflecting the Planning Commission <br />recommendation is attached for Council review. <br />