My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/4/2025 12:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
11/13/1989
Retention Effective Date
8/4/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that individual properties were looking for additional <br />hockups that would help decrease tht overall unit charge but <br />that property would then have to pay for more units. <br />S. Will a new subdivision, such as the one being proposed east <br />of Leaf Street, be included in the project? <br />It ha.,, not been the policy of the City to include any areas <br />that do not absolutely need sewer. This area is developing <br />to a 2 a:re standard and preliminary indications are that it <br />will ha'✓ -a adequate ^onditions for do -site septic systems on <br />each building site. Even if the City were to allow sewering <br />of this area, the topography of the area would require <br />significant design parameters that would not result in a <br />substantial reduction in unit lateral cost for the Stubbs Hay <br />project. Inclusion of all those units in the project may <br />reduce the trunk cost by about 13%. (100 units in Stubbs Hay <br />22, anits in "Sussex") <br />9. Why is the property on Oxford Road being left out? <br />Again, this area was develored to the 2 acre standard and <br />although it is lakeshore property which differentiates it <br />from the property east of Leaf, it is not contemplated to be <br />included as there should be adequate septic systems for this <br />area. Ba=ed on general City policy we have cot addressed <br />this question to the Council but we will address both this <br />and the question regarding the subdivision. The inclusion of <br />the Oxford property wodld probably reduce the trunk cost by <br />about 10i. (10 properties) <br />10. now soon could a project be undertaken? <br />The project progress is dependenc on the level of interest of <br />the neighborhood. If substantial interest is generated this <br />fall and hearings could be held this winter, plans could be <br />drawn this winter and construction begun in the spring. It <br />is inportant to realize that the Council will probably not <br />undertake this project unless a substantial majority of the <br />property owners are interested in undertaking this project to <br />the point of agreeing to sign a waiver of tppea on this <br />project. This is a neighborhood problem, and the <br />neighborhood should get together to decide how t'.ey want to <br />solve it. (It was mentioned that the current p.ices are as <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.