My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/4/2025 12:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
11/13/1989
Retention Effective Date
8/4/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. What are the costs of the project and what are anticipated to <br />be the financing options. <br />The costs are detailed on the sheet that was handed out, <br />split out betweet: about a 56,500 assessment charge and <br />between $4,20C and $9,700 connect+on charge. It is <br />anticipated that it would be a 15 to 20 year bond issue. If <br />your total assessment plus conne.tion charge was $lo,0oo <br />over 15 yaacs tf—tt would cost about $670 per year in interest <br />toget`7-:r wi h an initial interest cost of about $500 which <br />would be decrease over the 15 year period to a final year <br />interest cost in the range of $60.00. Spread over _ years, <br />the annual principal would go down but the amount of interest <br />paid over that timeperiod would be increased. If your rate <br />is $15,000 just multiply those numbers by 1.5 times the <br />$10,000 number. <br />3. Are the larger lots subsidizing the smaller lots? <br />To the extent that sewer is going to be installed u'jacent to <br />a large lot, a lot with a large frontage actually ^osts mort <br />to serve than a lot with a small frontage. To the extent <br />that sewer is needed the greater number of smaller lots <br />actually, defray the cost for the larger lots. (This is <br />balanced out by splittt the areas betveen the larger and <br />smaller lots ar' havin a lateral cost for the smaller <br />lots, in this �in, as than for the larger lots.` <br />4. Aren't there ot'. .aces, such as Cygnet Place, that in the <br />future will need ro have sewer? <br />The City staff has looked at Cygnet Plac as far as -ewerinq <br />and what impact that has on this project. It is anticipated <br />that that area will be looked at over the next 5 or 10 ears. <br />Whether the area needs sewer would be the subject of a Waste <br />Management Study and will be dependent, r..t only, on lot s-ze <br />but also topography, soil corditions, water table ate. ti.s <br />`poked at it as to how a sewer pipe ' be run on an <br />_::imate basis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.