Laserfiche WebLink
Members of the City of Orono <br />Planning Commission <br />Ms. Jeanne Mabusth <br />August 31, 1989 <br />Page Three <br />terminates with a cul-de-sac. The City's subdivision <br />regulations, however, state that the maximum cul-de-sac '.ength <br />is 1000 feet. The Preferred Plan eliminates this problem <br />by extending the access road to Leaf Street. We understand <br />that the connection of the access road to Leaf Street is <br />probably inevitable. Prudence suggests that it is better <br />to extend the access road to Leaf Street now, rather than <br />in the future, to eliminate the need for a 1400 foot cul-de-sac <br />and an accompanying variance. In addition, extending the <br />access road to Leaf Street allows for better police and fire <br />protection. Please note that Outlot A, which to ou. knowledge <br />does not seem to serve any purpose, is omitted from the <br />Preferred Plan. <br />3. Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Chadwick, owners of the property <br />shown on the Developer's Revised Plat as the "Exception," <br />desire to purchase, at a price to be negotiated, land adjoining <br />their property to bring their property into compliance with <br />the two -acre minimum. Their wish is in part driven by the <br />age of their septic system, aad the desire to have additional <br />land for its eventual relocation. We also call attention <br />to a letter addressed to the Chadwicks from John M. Lanier, <br />Sr_, dated June 14, 1989, in which Nit. Lanier stated that <br />he recalled a conversation with Jeanne Mabusth during which <br />Mrs. Mabusth inJA-cated tha`. the City would require Don Carlson <br />(whc was considered to he a future developer) to bring the <br />Exception into compliance with the subdivision regulations. <br />The Preferred Plan accomplishes this and accommodates the <br />Chadwick's corcerns. <br />4. The Preferred Plan provides for buff-. plantings <br />at appropriate locations along Fox Street and Leaf Street. <br />The buffer plantings are necessary to soften the Proposed <br />Development insofar as the subject land contains very little <br />mature vegetation in these places. <br />In sum, we contend that the Fi" 7 3 Plan answers the <br />problems that the Developer night have addre The Preferred <br />Plan proposes a development that, to our knowledge, is free of <br />variances, and deals with the issue of the Exception, without, <br />we believe, imposing an economic hardship on the Developer. <br />In addition to the above, we note that the Developer <br />ld attend to the following before obtaining ;)reliminary plat <br />approval. <br />