Laserfiche WebLink
WURST, PEARSON, L.ARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ <br />Mr. Thomas J. Barrett <br />September 20, 1989 <br />Page 2 <br />Pursuant to the resolution for preliminary plat approval, <br />your office was provided with a Title Insurance Company of <br />Minnesota ALTA Commitment (Application No. H596450E-Supplemental <br />U ). That Commitment shows Mr. Lauer as the proposed insured. <br />Your office has called my attention to Hennepin County Document <br />No. 3028744 (Book 203 of Deeds, Page 252). By that document, 13 <br />various parties grant to one another, their heirs, their <br />successors and assigns, an easement for road purposes over the <br />north 16 1/2 feet of the subject premises. The Wayzata Country <br />Club and the occurants of Fairway Vie-.: appear to be among the <br />present beneficiaries of that easement agreement. <br />Your office has advised me that the plat of Hauser/Lauer/WCC <br />Addition will not be released unless the successors of all of the <br />original parties to Document No. 3028744 (and their mortgagees) <br />sign written consents to the conveyance of a public road and <br />utility easement over Outlots B and C, Hauser/Lauer/WCC Addition. <br />On behalf of Mr. Lauer, I ask that the city delete this <br />requirement as unnecessary for two reasons. First, Ioc--iment No. <br />3028744, while it does not specifically utiliz• the word <br />"exclusive" or the word "nonexclusive" appears t-) create a <br />nonexclusive easement for road easement for road purposes. Each <br />of the parties to that 1956 agreement was granted the right to <br />convey road easement rights to subsequent owners. (A spot check <br />of the conveyances of tracts in Fairway View, seems to indicate <br />that the subsequent owners have referred to their easement rights <br />over the subject premises as being a "nonexclusive" easement.) <br />Second, while I did not have access to an abstract of title <br />covering the subject premises, a review of the tract index <br />indicates that Mr. Lauer, the Wayzata Country Club, and Mr. & <br />Mrs. Hauser all ultimately derive their title interests from the <br />Samuel h. Bowman, Jr., Trust Under Will (and the Northwestern <br />National Bank, acting as trustee). That trust was one of the <br />parties to the 1956 agreement. Thus, it would appear that Mr. <br />Lauer, the Wayzata 2ountry Club, and Mr. & Mrs. Hauser would have <br />a right to grant a roadway easement to the City of Orono <br />independent of any concerns regarding whether the 1956 easement <br />was "exclusive" or "nonexclusive". <br />I conclude that the City would not be jeopardized by b- <br />lack of consent forms signed by any successors to toe interests <br />created by Document No. 3028744. To obtain these consent forms <br />would place an onerous burden on both the Country Club and Mr. <br />Lauer. A large amount of work would be involved in identifying <br />those successors, identifying their mortgagees. Nei -her the <br />Country Club nor Mr. Lauer nor Mr. S Mrs. Hauser ha,re any control <br />over those parties and it is highly speculative whether the <br />successors under that document could be even convinced to sign <br />the forms. <br />