Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1458 <br />September 15, 1989 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />The assumption that the lots will be combined raises the <br />issue of use of the cabin at 324 Westlake Street as a guest <br />house. While that building contains no plumbing, it does have <br />electricity and a "kitchenette" i.e. contains a stove. The stove <br />could certainly be removed, making this a non -dwelling unit, with <br />use merely as a storage building. Ultimately, applicant notes <br />his intent would be to expand the house at 332 Westlake Street <br />northward, ultimately removing the cabin at 324 Westlake Street. <br />Septic Svstem Concerns <br />Orono's On -site swage Treatment Ordinance in Section 12.30, <br />Subdivision 4 (E) requi.- that permits for expansion of existing <br />buildings served by septic systems, may not be issued until the <br />septic system has been i,ispected and certified by the City as <br />being in compliance with this section. It goes on to state that <br />the City may require expansion of existing systems when the <br />"addition of bedrooms and plumbing fixtures . . .changes the <br />character or intensity of the established" use of a structure. <br />In this case, applicant has noted that the previous property <br />owners used the porch as a second bedroom, hence technically this <br />might be conceived as a pre-existing two bedroom house. Note <br />from applicant's building plans that his proposal is for ar+two <br />bedroom home. <br />Inspection of the existing system, in conjunction with a <br />review of City records regarding that system, indicate that there <br />are two 500 gallon tanks and approximately 250 square feet of <br />trench drainfield in three drainfield lines on the lakeshore side <br />of the house. The most downhill drainfield line is 79' from the <br />normal shoreline, meeting the setback requirement. The existing <br />system appears to be functioning adequately and no seepage or <br />evidence of past seepage is visible. <br />From a design standpoint, the existing drainfield system is <br />quite substandard based on current codes. The soil survey <br />indicates kilkenny soils at this site, which commonly would be <br />expected to have a perc rate requiring 300 s.f. of drainfield per <br />bedroom. The existing 250 s.f. drainfield would not technically <br />be large enough to serve a two bedroom house unless the soil was <br />a sand or sandy loam texture with a perc rate faster than 5 <br />minutes per inch. In general, the existing system would be <br />expected to be capable of serving two people, possibly three on a <br />long term basis. This also disregards the fact that Kilkenney <br />soils typically require use of a mound system due to seasonal <br />saturation zones near the surface. That seasonal saturation <br />tends to decrease the useful life of a trench -type drainfield. <br />