Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File i1458 <br />September 15, 1989 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />4. Hardcover on the property is as follows: <br />0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' <br />Lot 5 Only 1.7% 20.91 20.6%* 20%* <br />Lots 4 i 5 Combined 0.9% L5.4% 10.1% 10% <br />* Includes entire width of driveway <br />Based on the above, hardcover is not a factor in the current <br />proposal. <br />5. Applicant also proposes an extension of the house 8' east of <br />the existing wall. This would be located over the area of <br />the pre-existing porch which applicant has torn off. Note <br />that this addition would line up exactly with the <br />neighboring house to the south. It would extend nearer the <br />lake than the "guest house" on Lot 4, but would be behind <br />the average lakeshore setback defined by the next lakeshore <br />residence to the north at 3865 Bayside Road. The proposed <br />lakeward addition would be approximately 150' back from the <br />normal shoreline. <br />6. The site topography, location of wells on this property and <br />the neighboring property, and the fact that this is a long, <br />narrow lakeshore lot, all have a very limiting effect on the <br />additional development of this property without municipal <br />sewer. <br />Discussion - <br />If the applicant cannot combine these two properties, you <br />should look at Lot 5 as a separate parcel for variance review. <br />It would certainly be preferrable from a development standpoint <br />if the applicant could combine the two parcels and develop <br />towards the center of the property to maintain appropriate <br />setbacks. For purposes of this staff review, the assumption is <br />made that Lots 4 and 5 will ultimately be combined. <br />No average lakeshore setback variance is required presuming <br />that the adjacent residence to the north is 3865 Bayside Road. <br />The average lakeshore setback line is drawn under this <br />assumption. <br />Applicant would not be encroaching nearer either north or <br />south lot lines, but would be extending approximately 10-12' <br />vertically above the existing roof. As of this writing, no <br />comment from the neighbor to the south, who would be most <br />affected by the addition, has been received. <br />