Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OP TBE pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 8E1D AUGUST 17, 1987 <br />01172 BECK CONTINUED <br />placed 27 feet from the lakeshore. The deck pill <br />replace the existing cement stairs paved stepp <br />patio and storage structure located within 75 feet of <br />the lakeshore. The total hardcover to be removed is <br />509.5 s.f. 1. ..,viding a final reduction of 55.1 s.f. or <br />.5%. She also noted that wetland areas are credited <br />against the hardcover, almost half of the property <br />consists of wetlands. The existing steps and patio are <br />34' from the lakeshore, and the proposed deck is 27' <br />from the lakeshore. <br />James Beck explained that the deck is designed to <br />provide a safe and e. A ly negotiated access for elderly <br />individuals, which replaces the old patio. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />it was moved by Cohen, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to <br />recommend approval of the variances per staff <br />recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays O. <br />t1174 CRAIG K. ANDERSON <br />'375 IMF STREET/3300 BAYSIDE <br />SUBDIVISIOR <br />SECOND REVIEW <br />Craig Anderson was present for this matter. <br />ROAD <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the <br />preliminary plat drawing submitted by applicant and <br />reviewed the staff sketch recommending to adjust the <br />proposed property line to provide a larger building <br />envelope to- Lot 1 due to the steep slopes in Lot 1. <br />Variances Z. a needed for lot width at 50' setback for <br />both lots. <br />Craig Anderson was agrees?_e to staff's recommended lot <br />line change. <br />There were no comments f; c+a the public regarding this <br />matter. <br />Bellows atated that alt.i.:•.:gh the proposed subdivisic- <br />technically was allowed, --:.e felt it was bad planning to <br />create two flag lots wt. '. would present many problems. <br />She felt the lot would �3� r:,propriate for one house, <br />but would not support .!:t: flag lot subdivison. <br />In response to the questi7- ^_r how this parcel of land's <br />configuration came abcut, 1sr scant Zoning Administrator <br />Gaffron stated that the entire parcel was <br />subdivided it left th?.s tie lnt with two rectangular <br />5 <br />