Laserfiche WebLink
To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: August 17, 1989 <br />Subject: 01442 The Landschute Inc, 3300 Bayside Rd/375 Leaf St <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District - LR-lA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 <br />acre, unsewered <br />Application - 2-lot subdivision of vacant land to create 2 <br />building sites. Note: this proposed subdivision received <br />previous Planning Commission and Council approval in 1987 <br />but was never filed due to the previous applicant's failure <br />to pay the required fees. The prior approval expired on <br />November 9, 1988. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit D - Survey/Site Plan <br />Exhibit E - Documentation from Previous Approval <br />1. Staff Memos <br />2. Planning Commission & Council Minutes <br />3. Preliminary Plat Resolution #2269 <br />4. Final Plat Resolution #2420 <br />Pertinent Facty - <br />1. <br />LOT 1 <br />LOT 2 <br />TOZAL <br />Dry Buildable <br />2.28 ac. <br />2.50 ac. <br />4.78 <br />Wetland/Drainageway <br />0.97 ac. <br />0.07 ac:. <br />1.04 ac. <br />Total <br />--------- <br />3.25 ac. <br />--------- <br />2.57 ac. <br />--------- <br />5.82 ac. <br />2. Each lot has been shown <br />to contain a <br />feasible building site <br />exclusive of primary and <br />alternative <br />drainfield <br />sites with <br />proper setbacks. <br />3. Proposed Lot 1 will be served by a separate driveway from <br />Bayside Road. That driveway is configured to as to avoid <br />conflict with proposed drainfield sites. Proposed Lot 2 <br />will be served by a separate driveway from Leaf Street, also <br />placed to avoid the drainfield sit s. Note that a share. <br />driveway situation would require a 'airly long easement <br />through either one of the properties. Sight distance is <br />adequate at both locations, hence access safety is not a <br />concern. This plat was previously approved with these <br />separate accesses. <br />