My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 9/25/1989
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 9/25/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:49 AM
Creation date
7/29/2025 11:54:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
9/25/1989
Retention Effective Date
7/29/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I_5d9.1 <br />TO: mayor and City Council <br />rn.cm: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratoc+'� <br />1 <br />DATE: January 26, 1989 <br />SUBJECT: County Road 116 <br />Attachments: A. County Road 116 Dated 1/11/99 (Memo Only) <br />B. County Road 116 Draft Resolution <br />ISSUES - <br />Determination as to whether the Council wishes to adopt the <br />attached draft resolution as its statement of opposition to <br />County Road 116 proceeding south of 3ighway 55. <br />INTRODUCTIOt: - At the Council's last nesting they directed staff <br />to indicate the Council's opposition to County Road 116 going <br />forward together with tabling the balance of the issue related to <br />the City's action should the road be constructed. <br />DISCUSSION - In additson to the issues contained in Attachment A <br />is the t that an upgrade to standards similar to that the <br />County would be using on 'willow is contemplated in the City's <br />Capital Budget for about 1995. The estimated cost of this <br />reconstruction was approximately $300,000. Related to this was <br />the potential need for further right-of-way to the west to <br />protect homes on the east and that such be undertaken prior to <br />any development in that area. (As potential acquisition of <br />right-of-way may be required regardless of who reconstructs it, <br />it may be appropriate that the City explore giving the property <br />owners equivalent density credit for the right -cif -way given up in <br />exchange fn• no cost incurred in the right-of-way acquisition. <br />Zf the County were to do the road the only City cost would be <br />half the right-of-way costs.) It may be appropriate that this be <br />dedicated in any planned development or subdivision. <br />Raised at the meeting was the issue of the future location of <br />Highway 12 and its relocation to an upgraded willow. Should <br />Highway 12 stay with the current corridor 116 would continue to <br />provide the feeder to the extent that it presently is proposed. <br />To the extent that Highway 12 would go north of the current <br />location, they Willow/116 would provide an access route to that <br />northerly location. Should it go further south it would serve as <br />part of the conduit for traffic to Highway 12. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />Adoption of Resolution <br />a. Adopt the resolution <br />b. Amend and adopt <br />c. Table <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.