Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1429 <br />September 8, 1989 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />The decx in question appears to exceed the height <br />stipulation of this model ordinance, but that is due to the <br />change in topography. If such an ordinance was ever adopted, it <br />would he up to the City to determine whether applicant's deck <br />meets the height criteria. Agair, remember that this UNR rule is <br />not in effect but is one that Orono may well be approached to <br />cony -'er adopting at some future date, given the amount of <br />lakt cr.: in the City. <br />Staff Recoa endation - <br />Staff would recommend approval of the retaining walls, <br />finding that they are minor in scope but necessary to prote-t the <br />lakeshore bank from further *-`on. <br />Staff does not the Planning Commission <br />recommendation, however, as x -equests that Council consider <br />th( fact that this deck nch Jess intense use than the <br />pre-existing boat house, whit-_ he removed voluntarily without <br />realizing permits were necessary for that removal or deck <br />reconstruction. As noted in the Planning Commission me--n, if <br />Council ultimately determines that the deck can remain, the scue <br />of screening should be addressed. <br />i. resolution reflecting the Planning Commission <br />recommendation to allow the retaining Walls but deny the deck is <br />attached for Council review. <br />