Laserfiche WebLink
, _ . s <br /> • Resolution No. 1044 • . <br /> Page 5 � ' <br /> � <br /> 4. No application has been made to amend the zoning <br /> code to provide for boat slip rental as a principal <br /> � permitted use of lakeshore property. ' <br /> V. The plan proposed by Johnson includes items which require <br /> extensive analysis and review as we11 as permits from many <br /> agencies, none of which could reasonably be completed prior <br /> to the 1979 boating season. <br /> 1. The docks shown extend beyond the LMCD 200 ft, maximum <br /> extension for existing multiple docks and well beyond the <br /> LMCD 100 ft. maximum extension for new multiple docks. <br /> 2. The"docks shown encroach into required LMCD side setback <br /> • �areas. ' <br /> 3. The shoreline is shown as drastically altered and relocated <br /> '� with a new seawall, which work requires review and permits <br /> from the City, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and <br /> . � the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. <br /> 4. The plan shows new hard surfacing within 75 ft. of the <br /> lake shoreline in violation of City, MCWD, and DNR regulations. <br /> . ., <br /> ,- 5. The plan shows a new building located within the <br /> established flood plain in•violation of City, MCWD, and <br /> DNR regulations. - <br /> '6. No plan was submitted to show how sewage treatment could <br /> r be obtained in conformance with City, State Health Department, <br /> or State PCA requirements. <br /> 7. T'here has been no .application to any agency for any <br /> . variance from the above regulations. <br /> � 8. There has been no apPlication to any agency for a <br /> conditional use permit to provide for the shoreline alteration <br /> o� for constr�ction within the flood plain. <br /> 9. There has been no plan provided to show how docks could <br /> be constructed entirely within the authorized dock use area. <br /> � <br />