Laserfiche WebLink
m <br />3. Bids <br />A. Order p,:oj_-,ct In (Issue #1) <br />B. Formally reject <br />C. Table to July llth <br />RECOMMENDATION - Given the need for the project improvement and <br />the favorable bids at this point it is still recommended that thz <br />Council reconsider and that the project be ordered in on at• lea:,t <br />a 75% developer and 25% City split the costs. It is anticipated <br />any rebid in the future will be higher and may not generate the <br />75% from the developer. Should the City subsequently order the <br />road in after these bids lapse it is anticipated that the co:,ts <br />will be substantially higher to the developer and the City. If <br />not awarded it is recommended to formally reject the bids. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by that the Council <br />reject all bids for the Woodhill Aven.ie project. ;,yew Nays <br />cc: John McDowell, MSM & Associates, 315 East Lake, Wayzata <br />henry Kingman, Wood,ill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Rd <br />2 <br />