Laserfiche WebLink
ON <br />6141 <br />I <br />I <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrat <br />DATE: June 14, 1988 <br />STJBJECT: Woodhill Avenue <br />Attachments: A. Bid Tabulation - Woodhill Avenue <br />B. Woodhill Avenue Memo Dated 5/25/88 <br />ISSUE - <br />�n4ag4C-Vf 4 <br />1. Determine if Council will reconsider the award of t,id ordering <br />on the project. <br />2. If reconsidered and ordered in, what financing would be <br />appropriate. <br />3. If riot reconsidered, formal rejec=ion of bids. <br />INTRODUCTION - At the Council's June 13, 198E meeting on a 2 to 2 <br />vote regarding the ordering of the project the item did not <br />receive a sufficient majority to order the project. <br />As established in the bid specifications the bids which were <br />received on May 20, 1988 originally expired on June 20th, but <br />have been extended to July 20th. <br />DISCUSSION - As the Council has taken bids it would be <br />appropriate that if Council does not desire the prcject to go <br />ahead at this time that the bids be Normally rejected. As such <br />this would allow the Council at some future date, should it <br />desire to undertake the project, tc re -bid the project although <br />it is anticipated that the project bids will be at or above the <br />original Engineer's estimate inztead of the approximate $7,300 <br />below that is presently available under the bid. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Zeconsideration <br />A. Accept bid/Order project in <br />B. Not reconsider <br />C. Table to July llth <br />7 C 7/L <br />2. Financing J <br />A. Developer 75% - City 25% <br />B. Developer 75# - City 15% - 3 abuttinq owners 10% <br />C. Other <br />D. Table to July llth <br />1 <br />