My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
08-28-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
7/24/2025 11:54:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
8/28/1989
Retention Effective Date
7/24/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
477
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
70 <br />To. <br />Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />Planning Commission �.hairman Kelly <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernharuson <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Admini <br />From: Kim & Diane Mitchell <br />12304 - 12th Avenue North <br />Plymouth, MN ::5441 <br />Property address: <br />Date: July 11, 1989 <br />760 Hunt Farm Road <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />Subject: #1417- NorteLn States Power proposed electric sub-stati: <br />3960 - 6th Avenue t )rth <br />My wife and I are the preF nt owners of the residential property <br />at 760 Hunt Farm Road whi,-h immediatel, adjoins the proposed <br />development site to the West. Our building plans are designed <br />for a single-family dwe4linj with an estimated market value of <br />four hundred twenty five -housand dollars. Due to the topography <br />of our lot, our ground second floor -elevations are many feet <br />.tbove the proposed sub -station str.uccure. We have no alternative <br />but tc locate the house wit:: the rear elevation directed towards <br />the proposed suD—station structure. We became owners of this <br />property with assurances that there would only be "open space" <br />and possibly single-family development to the East. The proposed <br />sub -station comes as a complete surprise to us. <br />Need,.ss to say, we are adamantly opposed to tha proposed location <br />of this sub -station. The noise and lack of maintenance to the <br />sub -station grounds, as is the case with the present sLb-station <br />located at Highway 101 and the Luce Line cLrrontly, will have an <br />adverse i, -ct on the health, safety and welfare of the residents <br />in Oron: he detriment to the real estate values of the <br />resident. ;roperties surrounding this proposed sub -station a <br />of reams Ern to me. As Commission member Hanson noted, he <br />not p,irchase a residential property next to a sub -station as w.. <br />his decision sometime ago ,-ihen seeking prope ty near the lc, at - on <br />of the sub -station in Wayzati. In that case, t:ie sub-stati_.i was <br />before the development of re—dential property, not afterwards. <br />oftentimes people L.ch as NSP come upon a site which they consider <br />best sui.table for their deeds and then have trouble.-jeing <br />motivated to locate alternate sites. Find the location, have it <br />approved and then be done. I cannot belie- that there are not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.