My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5118
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 5100 - 5199 January 12, 2004 - June 14, 2004)
>
Resolution 5118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2020 3:37:41 PM
Creation date
11/10/2015 11:07:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 0 <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> Aq <br /> ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> SIIO4�G NO. 5i i 19 <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed the application for a variance and a conditional use permit at <br /> a public hearing held on February 17,2004 and recommended approval by a vote of 5-0 based <br /> on the following findings and hardships: <br /> A) Applicant requests variance approval for filling of a small portion of a City-protected <br /> wetland located mostly within applicant's property but partially within the neighboring <br /> property.The fill is intended to allow for the establishment of woody vegetation along the <br /> western property boundary.The 2,135 s.f.fill area will convert approximately 10%of the <br /> existing wetland from a shallow open water wetland to a wetland with saturated soils.The <br /> project also involves excavation of adjacent upland to create new wetland,requiring a <br /> conditional use permit. <br /> B) The property contains a small wetland which was modified in the 1950's (based on <br /> airphoto evidence)by dredging to make it deeper. The wetland since that time has <br /> generally had the characteristics of an open water pond. <br /> C) As a result of legal vegetation removals by the neighboring property owner to the west,the <br /> applicant's view over the pond area has changed,and now he views the neighboring <br /> residence rather than a wooded area. Because the far shore of the pond is on the <br /> neighboring property,applicant is proposing fill in a portion of the pond just inside his <br /> property boundary to create a"berm",which will allow the establishment of wooded <br /> vegetation to regain some of the wooded character of the lot and provide a buffer to the <br /> neighboring property. <br /> D) The applicant has engaged a variety of professionals to design a project that would meet <br /> the Wetland Conservation Act(WCA)guidelines for a wetland restoration,No-Loss <br /> status. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as the designated LGU for Orono has <br /> approved the fill and excavation project as a `No-Loss' wetland restoration based on <br /> reducing the impacts of wetland excavation that occurred in the 1950's,subject to certain <br /> conditions including submittal of a declaration for preservation of the wetland buffer which <br /> must be executed and recorded,and subject to ongoing monitoring and reporting of the <br /> wetland mitigation project for a five-year period. <br /> E) John Smyth, Water Resource Specialist with Bonestroo & Associates, the City's <br /> engineering and environmental consultants,has recommended approval of the project, <br /> noting that the project will result in an overall improvement to the wetland. Smyth noted <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.