Laserfiche WebLink
Du WAYNE L. SCHIBILLA <br />CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT <br />SUITE 314. SONS OF NORWAY BUILDING <br />1455 WEST LAKE STREET <br />MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55408 <br />TSuPHow (612) 827-5891 <br />May 8, 1980 <br />Mr. Thomas Jacobs, Building lnspector <br />Village of Orono <br />1335 Brown Road South <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br />Dear Mr. Jacobs: <br />I am writing this letter as you suggested to document our <br />conversation of last week and my concerns over the current con- <br />struction taking place at 3215 Crystal Bay Road (the Haverberg <br />property). <br />As I indicated to you I own the property at 3235 Crystal <br />Bay Road which shares a common property line with the 1tHaverberg <br />property". <br />A screen porch has been constructed over an existing slab <br />within the last year, which I do not have any problems with. My <br />concerns lie in the fact that I would not like any further improve- <br />ments made upon the screen porch (i.e. a three -seasons porch or <br />permanent living space) for a number of reasons some of which are <br />as follows: <br />The existing screen porch is no more than <br />3-4 feet from our common property line - <br />at a maximum. I am not sure this is in com- <br />pliance with current building ordiances. I <br />am sure it would restrict anything; I might <br />do to improve my own property. <br />The position of the screen porch is set <br />ahead of my house. As I indicated to you this <br />is no problem at this point in time since the <br />screen porch gives the illusion of not being <br />there (i.e. you can see through it). I would <br />not appreciate the porch being developed <br />further, as mentioned above, since it would <br />then restrict the view from my property. <br />The drainage off the porch roof must effect <br />my property simply because it is so close to <br />the lot line. <br />