Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br />Development Standards in the RPUD <br /> <br /> <br />RPUD <br />Standard <br />Proposed <br />Standard <br />(l) Accessory structures (coverage) N/A N/A <br />(m) Off-street parking At least 2 <br />vehicles Meet <br />(m) Suitable location for a garage 20' x 24' Meet <br /> <br />Section 78- <br />626(11) Private recreation area 10% of gross <br />project area <br />Need <br />flexibility7 <br /> <br />Section 78- <br />626(12) Ownership <br />Property <br />subject to legal <br />restrictions or <br />covenants as <br />may be <br />necessary to <br />ensure <br />compliance <br />with the <br />approved <br />master <br />development <br />plan and final <br />site and <br />building plan. <br />Meet <br /> <br />Section 78- <br />626(13) Signage requirements City approval Meet8 <br /> <br />Section 78- <br />626(14) Landscaping plan required -- Meet9 <br /> <br /> <br />7 Given that this proposed development is only 2 units, the applicant is requesting that flexibility <br />be given by waiving the private recreation area requirement. There is precedent in the City for not <br />requiring that 10% of the gross project area be dedicated to private recreational uses for project <br />residents. Recent examples include the Oliver Hill RPUD and the Orono Preserve RPUD. <br /> <br />8 No signage is proposed for the development. <br /> <br />9 Upon formal submission of an RPUD application, there would be a landscape plan that conforms <br />to the requirements of Section 78-626(14). At this time, there are not any concerns that the RPUD <br />would not be able to conform to the requirements of this section. A reasonable attempt will be <br />made to preserve as many existing trees as practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. <br /> <br />39