Laserfiche WebLink
STMfP RBCOmiBlIDATION: <br />Absent any revised information from the applicant, staff would concur <br />with the Planning Commission recommendation. In the memo to the Planning <br />Commission, staff suggested that if Planning Commission wished to approve <br />some proposal for the site, the following criteria would be appropriate: <br />1. No increase above the existing 29.9% hardcover (75-250*). <br />2. Maintain 10* required rear lot-line setback. <br />3. Maintain 10* required setback from the house and existing detached <br />garage unless a hardship is shown. <br />4. Reduce size to meet 1,000 s.f. maximum floor area requirement. <br />5. Applicant should be urged to revise his proposal to reduce the <br />impact of the structure on the property. <br />If the applicant or his agent brings a revised proposal to the Council <br />meeting. Council has the option to review that proposal and take what ever <br />action may be approporiate, or Council may wish to refer that proposal to <br />the Planning Commission. If referral to the Planning Commission does <br />occur, it would be reviewed at the October 3rd meeting. If no further <br />proposal is forthcoming and Council takes action on the current proposal, a <br />/^Nresolution reflecting that action will be presented to Council at your next <br />^eeting.