Laserfiche WebLink
H) The Cl'vY ^»as asked for Increased police supervision <br />In the area to enforce "no parking" along county road. <br />4. The applicant proposes the removal of 6 mature trees as <br />a result of the expanded parking area within the 0-75* <br />setback area. Per amended Section 10.22, Subdivision 3, the <br />applicant shall apply for a staff permit for tree removal <br />and in addition submit a planting schedule for the required <br />replacement trees. <br />5. On April 20, 1989, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br />District granted a permit that would approve the expansion <br />of the parking area and the retention pond with treatment <br />facility for the Minnetonka Boat Works. <br />6. Glenn Cook, City Engineer, in a report dated April 12, <br />1989, conceptually approved the proposed drainage plan and <br />ponding area subject to specific modifications in the <br />proposed plan. <br />7. Wayne A. Matsumoto of the Hennepin County Department of <br />Public Works, in a report dated May 3, 1989, noted the <br />following: <br />A) The County was not aware of an accident problem in <br />this area and recommended approval of a marked cross­ <br />walk to serve the clients of the marinas. He did not <br />feel the limited number of accidents within this <br />section of County Road 15 would warrant the <br />installation of flashing yellow lights. <br />B) He added that a pedestrian bridge would appear to <br />be out of the question because of the limited land area <br />and land base needed to support the handicapped <br />requirement. <br />C) He also noted that a walk-way under the Tanager <br />Lake Bridge for the clients of the marina may result in <br />a security risk. <br />8. The City Council has considered this application <br />including the findings of the Planning Commission, reports <br />by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of <br />the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of <br />the community. <br />Page 3 of 8