Laserfiche WebLink
"Fire" is cited at a higher rate by: <br />• "empty -nesters" <br />• Precinct Two residents <br />A second question was asked this small subgroup of residents: <br />How much would you be willing to pay in additional <br />property taxes to enhance city services or offer addi- <br />tional city services? How about $ per year? How <br />about $ per year? <br />The typical supporter would support a property tax increase of $46.80 per year: <br />NOTHING ......................................... <br />0% <br />a <br />0 <br />$80.00 5% <br />$100.00............................................ <br />8% <br />$120.00............................................ <br />3% <br />$140.00............................................ <br />3% <br />$160.00........................................... <br />11% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ............................ <br />5% <br />"$60.00" is cited more often by: <br />• households with children <br />"$100.00" is indicated more frequently by: <br />• those not contacting City Hall <br />"$160.00" is posted at a higher rate by: <br />• Precinct One residents <br />Summary and <br />Conclusions <br />Orono residents award two city services a positive rating of 85% or higher: police protection and <br />fire protection. Next, residents assign favorable ratings in the 60%-range to four city services: <br />snowplowing of city streets, accommodation and control of storm water run-off, sanitary sewer <br />services, and street sweeping. Fifty-three percent rate street lighting positively. Two services are <br />given favorable ratings in the 40%-range: municipal water service and city street maintenance. <br />In the case of the municipal water service, a large 44% are unable to rate that service. But, in the <br />34 <br />