Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1375 <br />February 15, 1989 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Discussion - <br />The applicant has included a hardship statement and a statement of <br />unusual property conditions. Applicant notes that the -oposed location <br />for the addition has the least impact on this property and neighboring <br />properties because it minimizes the degree of average setback encroachment, <br />minimizes the additional hardcover necessary, while it is the logical <br />location for the addition to the existing living area. <br />There would appear to be no excessive hardcover on the property that <br />could be easily or appropriately removed in order to decrease the hardcover <br />percentages. Staff could find no plastic under landscape areas around the <br />house. <br />The hardcover and average setback variances requested are typical of <br />and consistent with other variances that have been granted for the Casco <br />Point area. <br />Options for Planning Commission Action - <br />Planning Commission has the following options: <br />1. Recommend approval, making findings to support such approval based <br />on hardships and unusual property conditions noted above. <br />2. Recommend denial, making findings which support a denial. <br />4. Other. <br />3. Table for further information. <br />-* • H ^ <br />'CiT - /<T . Cy Vi <br />.^r <br />/vr* <br />eik C . - •srrtHs: <br />, pi c