05-08-1989 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1389 April 10, 1989 Page 2 of 2 3. The deck is located 27.3* from the rear lot line, and just 50* from the front lot line at the cul-de-sac. The property to the immediate east (or rear) of the property is low and likely not buildable. This is not a designated wetland. The properties to either side are developed with single family residences, neither of which would be significantly impacted by the deck in question. 4. The property is in the 500-1,000* lakeshore setback zone. Existing hardcover including the deck is about 17.6% where 35% would be allowed. No hardcover variance is necessary. 5. The new deck is about 12'x20* (240 s.f.) plus stairway. The old deck dimensions have not been verified, but the City Assessor*s records indicate an odd-shaped deck about 10'xl6*-plus. From the shape of the old deck, it is likely the new deck is no closer to the rear lot line than the old deck. Discussion - As we have seen in many similar situations in recent years, decks constructed prior to the ready availability of treated lumber are falling into disrepair and being replaced, often without permits. The Mardocks have been very cooperative in making the appropriate after-the-fact application upon being notified that a permit was necessary. The proposed deck would appear to have no effect on neighboring propertiois, and replaces a deck that previously existed in the same location. Staff has received no comments from neighboring property owners. Note that Planning Commissioner Jim Hanson is the abutting neighbor to the south. Staff Recofluiendation - Based on the above noted facts, plus the concerns associated with a pre-existing patio door that would walk out into space if some sozt of deck is not provided. Planning Commission could recommend approval based on the finding that the deck merely replaces a pre-existing deck.