My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
04-24-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2025 9:22:41 AM
Creation date
4/7/2025 2:21:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
572
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: <br />Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:September 26, 1980 <br />Subject: #990 Ward Ferrell, 3405 Watertown Road - <br />Variance - Revised Proposal - Referral From Council <br />Zoning District - RR-IB, Single Family, 2 Acre, Unsewered <br />% <br />Application - The applicant has revised his proposal, and is requesting a <br />variance to build a new residence on one of his three one-acre <br />parcels, rather than his previous request to build a house on each of <br />the two vacant one-acre parcels. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Notice of Council Action Dated 9/21/88 <br />Exhibit B - Memo « Exhibits of 9/8/88 <br />Discussion - <br />Please review carefully the memo and exhibits of September 8, 1988. <br />That memo will give a background regarding the applicant's original <br />request, a history of City codes in relation to this property, a history of <br />action by the City to date on this request, and additional pertinent <br />factors. <br />Planning Commission is specifically requested to make a recommendation <br />Council regarding two issues: <br />1. Does the Planning Commission still hold to the Planning Commission <br />recommendation of February 18, 1986 to recommend approval of one <br />additional house on the total three acre property, for a density of <br />one house per 1.5 acres? <br />2. If so, which of the following configurations for the property is <br />appropriate: <br />A) Require a lot line rearrangement and combinations so that <br />there are two 1.5 acre tax parcels. <br />B) Grant buildability to one of the one acre parcels, deny <br />the other one acre parcel and require that the new building site <br />be a combination of the two vacant lots.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.