Laserfiche WebLink
u <br />From 2 <br />Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Michael P. Gaffron. Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator <br />Date2 October 19, 1988 <br />19M ».r.i P.rr.ll, 3405 B.t.rto.n - V.tl.oc <br />co„.«o=.‘. .1091. » ”•=•”« P”-' <br />adjacent to his existing residence. <br />E^hiM^f- staff Sketch Showing Planning Commission Recommendation s <br />Staff Recommendation m/l/aa <br />.4hil.it . - .l.»hl.9 Oo™i..io. hctltn “‘f <br />Exhibit C - Planning Commission Minutes of 10/3/ <br />Exhibit D - Memo S Fthibits of 9/26/88 <br />Planning Commission 1 .lendation - commission for review upon <br />This item was rt... ‘^d to th. J earlier application. The <br />applicant's OcIoberBrd meeting, recommended on a vote of <br />Planning Commission at their Octoc lot for this 2.90 acre <br />4-2 to approve a single by legally <br />property, and further 0 85 acre parcel', creating a parcel <br />combining the 1.04 acre parce house on a 1.01 acre parcel, <br />of 1.89 acres in from a precedent standpoint, this would <br />The Planning Commission felt variance of .11 acres or 5% rather <br />“.r,".'..”*', “ t"r:.tl..=.. -itP . 4.594.1.10. .ppllctlo. .... -03'' <br />create a new building site. <br />Note that the Planning <br />against for approval of a new Litial vote was a motion to <br />into it, was the second mot on ,he 2 sites. That <br />approve with the beinj^^ minutes that Cohen's vote <br />motion failed on a vo • f^ct that he was not in favor of any <br />of -aay on this _ it would appear that Planning Commission <br />additional houses on the property, issue of how the remaining <br />was not in total agreement regard-.ng the issue or <br />property should be apportioned.