My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
04-24-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2025 9:22:41 AM
Creation date
4/7/2025 2:21:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
572
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1261 <br />April 19, 1989 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Planning Commission originally gave applicants direction that a 6* <br />setback to the west lot line would be acceptable, since that would maintain <br />the 10* required minim>-m setback to the neighbors* house. Subsequent <br />measurements indicate that the neighbors* house is 5.3* from the lot line, <br />hence a 4.7* setback is proposed by the applicants. The 4.7* setback <br />increases to about 6* at the northwest corner of the garage under Plan A. <br />This plan leaves a garage width of 22 to 24*, and a garage depth of 26*. <br />Plan B keeps the west garage wall perpendicular to the rest of the <br />house, and if the garage was built at a 26* depth, would leave a S' setback <br />to the street lot line and an 8.9* setback to the side lot line at the <br />northwest corner of the lot (see Exhibit B). <br />Applicants no’^* f. that if Plan A is approved, they anticipate this will <br />provide enough storage for lawn and garden equipment so that the storage <br />shed could be removed, resulting in final 75-250* hardcover of about 60.7%. <br />If the expanded garage space is not approved, they feel the storage shed <br />must remain and this results in 66.4% of 75-250* hardcover. <br />Summary of Vc^iances Req* <br />PLAN A <br />ited - <br />-Replace house foundation: <br />[existing setbacks to <br />street (10*), E. side (3*), <br />lake (58*)] <br />-Add detached garage: <br />Side setback 4.7* (10* req.) <br />Street setback 7.0* (30* req.) <br />(26* garage depth) <br />-(Shed removed) <br />-Hardcover ? <br />0-75* pre-exifttir../;. 2?.3% (1701 sf) <br />0-75* propoa..>> (1162 sf) <br />7r 250* pre-ex:.sring: 44.7% (961 sf) <br />75-250* proposed: 60.7% (1305 sf) <br />Planning Commission Recemmendation - <br />PLAN B <br />-Replace house foundation <br />(existing setbacks as at left) <br />-Add detached garage: <br />Side setback 4.7* (10* req.) <br />Street setback 9.0* (30* req.) <br />(11* if garage depth ■ 24*) <br />-Shed setback: <br />to house (less than iO*) <br />to street (leas ’ ^n 10*) <br />-Hardcover: <br />0-75* pre-exisr.liig: 37.3% ^1701 sf) <br />0-75* proposed: 25.5% (ll'c - rf) <br />75-250* pre-existing: 44.7% (S61 sf) <br />75-T50* proposed: 66.4% ii^.8 jf) <br />At th*ir March 20th meeting. Planning Cr <br />following <br />1. Allow no expansion cf house close*; c <br />supersccu<*'^ure (i.^. denial of 4* additif * to <br />have F*nce withdrawn this requent. <br />led the <br />.'j aian existing <br />Applicants
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.