Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1387 <br />March 14, 1989 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Findings and Hardships Cited by Applicant - <br />Unusual shape of lot. <br />2. <br />3. <br />House location on lot prior to existing zoning (principal structure <br />met zoning standards at the time of construction in 1969}. <br />Location of house on lot and interior floor plan restricts <br />construction of deck on east and south side of residence structure. <br />Options of Action Available to Planning Co*ission - <br />1. Denial based on the findings set forth in Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 <br />requiring the immediate removal of structure. <br />2. Approval of application as submitted and advise the <br />for the appropriate building permit so that the building <br />confirm stlucture satisfies all pertinent standards of the building <br />code. <br />3. Approval subject to current deck being altered so that there ^2 <br />farther encroachment into the substandard setback than what «*i“ted <br />with the previous deck at 14*. Once again, <br />adequate information so that staff can issue the required building <br />permit for the new construction. <br />April 4, 1989 ^ 4.4Additional CoaMents and Planning Coamiaaion Recoaaondation - <br />Additional Exhibit - ^ ^ i.Exhibit G - Applicant's Sketch of Former Deck <br />The Planning Commission refused to accept the existing deck as it <br />encroached further into a substandard rear setback. **^®*®* ^ Staff <br />r ift a sketch drawn by the applicant of the former decK. <br />sketch (Exhibit D) was based on the deck^as^aabove, we have no definite knowledge of dimensions of previous deck as a <br />SSim'nrpe^it was not issued. Staff finds it o'nTssumed <br />the Council that the present deck be trimmed back 2'8* bas^d on <br />location of previous deck. The Planning Commission approved the ®«tback <br />variance of the new deck based on the northeast extension trimmed <br />back to a 14' setback. A second part of that recommendation *5 <br />nenaltv fee. The vote was a split 2-2 vote, in iignr ot <br />Council's previous action at their March 27, 1989 meeting, we will <br />0 not fine residents for work done without permits as long as there <br />record of them ever having been in violation of the City <br />applicant is hereby advised, based on the <br />Council, that there will be no additional penalty fees charged for the <br />variance application nor the building permit.