My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1980-1989 Microfilm
>
1989
>
03-27-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 12:16:27 PM
Creation date
3/28/2025 12:14:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Prom: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Issues - <br />Michael P. Gaffron <br />March 23, 1989 <br />, Asst Planning & Zoning Admiirt?Jra^pr|^Tj-r-y,^ <br />r.-'. 27 <br />#1366 Loren Butterfield, 3925 Watertown Road - <br />second Review <br />At the Council meeting of February 13, 1989, Council tabled this <br />application pending further staff review of issues related to applicant's <br />proposed changes to the standard Plowage & Conservation Easement. Also, <br />the applicant was asked by staff to submit in writing his concerns <br />regarding the plat approval conditions recommended by the Planning <br />Commission. The issues have been defined as follows: <br />1. The applicant feels that allowing no accessory structures south of <br />the Luce Line is too restrictive. This is addressed in Item I below. <br />2. Applicant objects to the 100' setback for accessory structures <br />from the Luce Line Trail. (Planning Commission has since clarified <br />that on the north side of the Luce Line, accessory structure would <br />only be subject to the normal 10' rear lot line setback.) <br />3. Applicant requests that specific language within the Conservation <br />& Flowage Easement be revised for the southerly wetland, and that no <br />easement be required for the pond near the greenhouse operation. This <br />is addressed in Item II below. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Applicant's Comments Regarding Resolution Conditions <br />Exhibit B - Applicant's Proposed Easement Wording <br />Exhibit C - Staff Sketch of Location of Woods, Trail, & Peat Removal <br />Area in Relation to Luce Line Trail <br />Exhibit D - Letter to Applicant of 3/20/89 <br />Exhibit E - Memo & Exhibits to Planning Commission, 3/14/89 <br />Exhibit F - Letter to Applicant, 3/8/89 <br />Exhibit G - Letter to City Attor.i.5/ Barrett, 3/6/89 <br />Exhibit H - List of Exhibits Sent to City Attorney for Review <br />Exhibit I - Letter to City Engineer, 3/6/89 <br />Exhibit J - File Documents Regarding 1975 Discussioiv of Peat Removal <br />Use • <br />Exhibit K - Draft Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution <br />Exhibit L - Council Action Notice, 2/28/89 <br />Exhibit M - Council Minutes, 2/13/89 <br />Exhibit N - Memo & Exhibits of 2/9/89 <br />Exhibit 0 - Applicant's Submittals Regarding Non-Conforming Accessory <br />Uses <br />Exhibit P - Applicant's Greenhouse Operation Brochure <br />^>04. 61 gciAfO ©A-TTEY’F/eT-lb
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.