Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of <br />plant species was taken from the 2014 National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar, R.W. and Kartesz, <br />J.T. 2009. North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List, version 2.4.0 <br />(https://wetland_plants.usace.army.mil). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and <br />Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, and <br />BONAP, Chapel Hill, NC.) <br /> <br /> <br />III. RESULTS <br /> <br />Review of NWI, Soils, and DNR Information <br />The National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) (Excelsior/Hamel Quadrangles, MN DNR 2013) <br />showed one PEM1Bd wetland within the property (Figure 3). <br /> <br />The Soil Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota <br />(http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo/) showed Cordova and Hamel as the hydric soil <br />types present within the review area. A soils map indicating the soil types present within the <br />parcel is included on Figure 4 <br /> <br />The DNR Public Waters Map, Hennepin County (http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/) showed no DNR <br />Public Waters within 1000’ of the property (Figure 5). <br /> <br />Wetland Determinations and Delineations <br />Potential wetlands were evaluated in greater detail during field observations on April 18, 2015. <br />One (1) wetland was identified adjacent to the subject site (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms <br />are included in Appendix A. The following description of the wetland and its adjacent upland <br />reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time precipitation conditions <br />were normal based on available 30-day rolling precipitation data and dry based on the three- <br />month antecedent conditions (January, February, March) (Appendix B). A survey of the <br />wetland boundary by Sathre-Bergquist is included in Appendix C. <br /> <br />Wetland 1 was a Type 2 (PEM1Bd) wet meadow. The wetland was dominated by a fringe of <br />reed canary grass with cattail present north of the wetland fringe. Saturation was observed near <br />the surface at the sample point location with free water observed 16” below the soil surface. <br /> <br />Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by box elder trees, common buckthorn <br />shrubs, and reed canary grass and common burdock. <br /> <br />The delineated boundary followed an abrupt change in topography and was placed along the <br />transition zone from wetland to upland plant communities, where hydrology indicators were no <br />longer present, and the transition from hydric to non-hydric soils. Wetland 1 was indicated on <br />the NWI map as a PEM1Bd wetland and was located in an area of mapped Hamel (hydric) on the <br />soil survey. According to the survey provided by Sathre-Bergquist, the delineated wetland lies <br />outside the property boundary. <br /> <br />