My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1980-1989 Microfilm
>
1989
>
02-27-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:00:47 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 9:57:54 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF REGULAR OROMO COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1366-BUTTERFIELD CONTINUED <br />and does have vehicular access over the Luce Line. Outlet A <br />contains wetlands and there is a total of 2 1/2 acres of dry land <br />both north and south of the Luce Line. The Planning Commission <br />recommended that no structures be allowed south of the Luce Line <br />and that there be a 100' setback from the Luce Line right-of-way. <br />Mr. Butterfield was requesting that the pond in Lot 1 be excluded <br />from the conservation and flowage easement. <br />Mr. Butterfield was present anr explained that he built the <br />pond in 1953 for the purposes of i :regation and drainage. When <br />full, the pond will hold 1,100,000 gallons. <br />Acting Mayor Callahan stated that in his opinion the entire <br />application should be tabled due to the need to review the <br />conservation and flowage easement issue. Counciimember Goetten <br />concurred. <br />It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by <br />Counci Imember Goetten, 1:o tabls this item until the February 27, <br />1989 Council Meeting. MotiCii, Ayes=4, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />ENGINEER'S REPORT: <br />1989 ENGINEERING RATES <br />CounciImember Peterson inquired as to whether the proposed <br />engineering rates would be comparable to rates charged to other <br />communities. City Administrator Bernhardson said that having not <br />done a recent rate review he could not specifically answer that <br />jestion. Previous rates charged by Bonestroo have been <br />comparable. City Engineer Cook informed the Council that the <br />rates were in line with rates charged to other clients; Bonestroo <br />tried to be consistent and competitive, and in some cases, <br />charged a lower rate/hour than other firms. <br />It was moved by CounciImember Peterson, seconded by <br />CounciImember Nettles, to approve the proposed 1989 rates as an <br />amendment to the contract with Bonestroo and Associates for <br />engineering services. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />MAYOR'S REPORT: <br />There was no report from the Mayor. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />COUNTY ROAD 51 PARKING <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that due to the <br />late arrival of information from Hennepin County, he was unable <br />to arrange to have residents in the area present. Hennepin <br />County is now proposing a fourth alternative to address the sight <br />distance problem. The new proposal would involve removal of 4 <br />parking slots along the bend in County Road 51 between the <br />Hen'^rickson Bridge to Baldur Park Road. It is Bernhardson*s <br />intention to have the residents present and discuss this proposal <br />at the February 27, 1989 Council Meeting.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).