02-27-1989 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MIMUTBS OF REGULAR OROHO COUHCIL MBBTIHG PBBROART 13, 1989 ZOEIEG PILE «1364-GAGB CORTIMUED CounciImember Nettles asked Planning Commissioner Hanson for his input. Hanson explained the process of review performed by the Planning Commission for this particular item. Hanson concurred with the applicant in that 6 feet, with or without a railing, would be more safe than 4 feet. Nettles questioned the height of the walkway. Gaffron replied that it would be approximately 4-5 feet above the existing ground, a portion of which is below the 929.4* elevation and considered as lakebed but exposed due to low water levels. However, when the water level of Lake Minnetonka was restored it would be approximately 2* above the water. Gaffron went on to say that should the water level rise to 930* it would be necessary to connect the walkway with a temporary seasonal dock out to the lake. Hanson believed that the code would require a rail for elevations of 4* or more, regardless of the width. Councilmember Peterson felt that it would set a precedent if the Council were to approve a 6* wide dock/walkway. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron commented on the positioning of the support posts and questioned whether there would be any problem with placing them at more of an angle, rather than straight up and down. It was moved by Counci lmemb«.r Nettles to adopt this Resolution with the 6* width as recommended by the Planning Commission. There being no second to this motion, it failed. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt this Resolution, allowing only a 4* width with a railing. Mr. Stockdale at this point requested that this item be tabled. Councilmember Goetten withdrew her Motion. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson to table this matter. Motion, Ayes«4, Nays*0, Motion passed. #1366 LORES BOTTBRPIBLL 3925 WATERTOmi ROAD CLASS II PRBLIMIHART SUBDIVISION RESOLUTIOS City Administrator Ber^ihardson Informed the Council that Mr. Butterfield was proposing to divide off a portion of his property on the north side of the Luce Line. He is also requesting a lot combination of property located south of the Luce Line and the creation of a 28* outlot corridor which will come within 1* of existing greenhouse buildings. New information was presented to the Council regarding flowage and conservation easements, waiver of damages and some revisions to the original proposal. Due to the fact that neither the Council nor Staff had an opportunity to review this information, Bernhardson requested tabling at this portion of the application. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron briefly added that Mr. Butterfield would like to keep Outlot B with Lot 1