01-23-1989 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 3 of 6 A) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Structures are not allowed within the 75* lakeshore setback zone. B) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - This pool is considered an accessory structure that is located closer to the shoreline than the average lakeshore setback line, past which no encroachment is normally allowed. C) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - The proposed structure constitutes hardcover in excess of the 0% hardcover allowed in the 0-75* setback zone, and includes land alteration to raise the grade approximately 3* higher than the pre-existing grade, where no such land alteration is normally allowed in the 0-75* zone. D) Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Also prohibits structures and land alteration within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. E) Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - The required side yard setback for any structure is 10*. There is no basis on which the City can grant approval for a structure that straddles a property line. Note that although this structure is *• 3ss than 120 s.f. in area, hence it does not technically requii • i permit, it still must meet the zoning setback requirements. 6. The applicants are proposing to mitigate the effects of the additional run-off created by the pool and patio, by constructing the pool apron such that all water falling on the pool and patio is contained within the pool itself, with an overflow discharge at a presumably slower rate into a drainfield to be located adjacent to the pool. Similar types of run-off infiltration structures have been suggested by the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District for use in lakeshore areas, however, such a practice has not been adopted in Orono. Note that, if the drainfield system works as proposed, most of the debris and nutrients carried in the run-off would be carried into the ground for natural dispersal into the watertable.