Laserfiche WebLink
/(rrAOiwuenor'/: <br />TOs Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato <br />DATE: April 15, 1988 <br />SUBJECT: County Road 116 <br />Attachment: <br />ISSUE - <br />A. City of Medina Letter Dated 3/15/88 <br />B, County Road 116 Memo Dated 7/7/87 <br />(Plus Attachments A through F only) <br />1. Determination as to whether the City desires to, at this <br />point, consider further the issue of County Road 116. <br />2. If the Council desires to further consider the request of the <br />City of Medina regarding 116 the means by which it undertakes <br />this consideration. <br />3. Present documentation of information related to potential <br />cost for the City of Orono as it would relate to construction of <br />116. <br />Introduction - At the council's July 13, 1987 meeting they heard <br />information presented regarding the proposed extension of County <br />116 south from Highway 55 to Highway 12. This request for the <br />County Road was made because the City of Medina; <br />a. ) Desires a better north/south access through its <br />community, <br />b. ) It does not qualify for Municipal State Aid funds, <br />and <br />c. ) The County's policy requires that the extensions be <br />from one state highway to another state highway. <br />There was substantial opposition generated against this proposal <br />with attendees both from the City of Medina and the City of Orono <br />when the Council had discussed it last summer. The Council's <br />direction at its July 13, 1987 meeting was that the staff bring <br />back this issue to Council at the point that staff felt that <br />further discussion of 116 would be in the best interest of Orono. <br />To date there has been no evidence to show any benefit to Orono <br />apart from Willow Road capital costs and any impact on <br />signa1ization. This item is being brought up at this time in <br />response to Attachment A from the City of Medina and staff's <br />belief that it is a courtesy to the City of Medina that the <br />Council should at least address whether they want to further <br />consider the matter at this point. <br />DISCUSSION - Since the Council's consideration last summer the