My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-09-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
01-09-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2025 10:23:04 AM
Creation date
3/10/2025 10:20:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
550
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PlllallSf Entry Monuments & Gateways <br />Decemper 29, 1988 <br />Page 2- of 5 <br />I • <br />Additional code sections dealing with various aspects of this issue <br />are as followsi <br />1. Section 6.01, Definition of Private Road and Private Driveway. <br />2- Section 6,07 makes it illegal to place signs or other structures <br />in right-of-way of a public street or private road. <br />3. Section 10.02 zoning code definitions of: <br />- Accessory use or structure (Definition #1) <br />- Building (Definition #12) <br />- Signs (Definitions #58 through 64) <br />- Structure (Definition 69) <br />4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 deals with accessory buildings (note <br />that most entryway gates and monuments would not fit the definition of <br />a building). Also, Subdivision 16 deals with corner lots and traffic <br />visibility. <br />5. Section 10.61 - "Special Provisions," Subdivision 1 deals with <br />sign standards and requirements. <br />6. Section 10.75 - "Height of Structures," Subdivision 1 (E) suggests <br />that "monuments" are an item that could be allowed a 50% increase in <br />height under a conditional use permit. At issue is whether this <br />monument terminology is intended to apply to entry pillars. <br />Zaaiias - <br />The following would appear to be general issues to be addressed in <br />formulating a polJcy or ordinance amendment regarding pillars and gatesx <br />A) Should pillars or monuments be allowed flanking existing or new <br />public roads ? (a recent example is the Bro*m Road entrance to Webber <br />Hills)I flanking new or existing crivate roads ? (a recent i^ple is <br />Countryside Drive); or sho u1 d they be allowed . .anking <br />private driveways? (recent examples are Gumucio on West Ferndale, <br />Asahari on Fox Street, and Halley Homes/Terry on Kelly Avenie). <br />B) For pillars and "wing walls", what should be the maximum height of <br />pillar or wall, what should be the maximum dimensions of light <br />fixtures above such structures, what setbac should be required from <br />property lines? <br />C) Should there be limitations on the type of lighting used with such <br />structures? <br />D) What should be the minimum clearance between pillars (with or <br />without a gate)?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.