Laserfiche WebLink
slowly. <br />Issue #2 - Imoact of Navarre Heights on Togo Road - Whi?e the <br />ti le irne“does exist towards Togo, as noted above, the water from <br />Navarre Heights dissipates through a combination of drainage <br />towards Crystal Place and down towards the lake and evaporation <br />from the area on the north side of the tracks, while this area <br />needs to be cleaned out, this would be appropriate regardless of <br />whether the Navarre Heights project were developed or not. It is <br />estimated that this project could be done by a City crew in 2 <br />days. <br />The question related to Navarre Heights impact on Togo Road is <br />dependent on whether, with the proposed project in place, the <br />water would move more quickly down to the ponding area by the <br />railroad tracks at a faster rate ..nd, if in fact, that would <br />create a greater overflow of watv=r through the' culvert down <br />towards Togo Road. Based on elevations and estimated volume of <br />water from Livingston, it does not appear that this will have an <br />appreciable negative impact and, in fact, a sealing of this tile <br />line could be an option. <br />Public Hearing - If the Council decides to further pursue the <br />Navarre Heights project, a public hearing could be set for the <br />November 26th meeting at which time plans a^c specs would be <br />completed and the project would be outlined by the Engineer, <br />notices put in both the paper and sent to the individual property <br />owners and then the Council deciding whether they need to <br />undertake the project or not. One issue raised at the October <br />22nd meeting was, at the point the Council orders the project, <br />whether they need a 3/5*s or 4/5's vote. It is the City <br />Attorney's initial opinion at the last meeting that given the <br />removal of the signatures, it would require a 4/5's vote to <br />proceed in ordering the project. As you will note in the project <br />schedule, which is Attachment C, that this actual ordering of the <br />project would be after bids were taken, the assessment hearing <br />held and the number of appeal waivers determined. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Drainage on Togo - <br />1. Accept the informati <br />2. Direct Engineer to develop a storm plan for this area <br />3. Recommend individual property owners reinstate <br />previously existing drainage using swales etc. <br />4. Tak^ no action <br />5. Table for further discussion <br />2. Impact of this project on Togo