12-10-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1521 December 3, 1990 Page 2 of 2 In addition, it is recommended that a covenant be filed against the chain of title of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 in order to ensure septic test sites are protected at some future date when driveway is constructed to serve Lot 2, Block 2. The enclosed resolution has included these as conditions of approval. Once again, the key issue for this subdivision review is access and future access. The Planning Commission strongly recommends that Wear Lane North and Wear Circle be made public roads because of the unique circumstances surrounding the existing private road to the immediate south, and the conflict of overlapping maintenance responsibilities. An issue not addressed in the earlier review was the question of access to the west, specifically, to the Avery Stubbs' property. The Planning Commission was asked to determine if the 25' corridor should be taken along the south lot line of Lot 1, Block 1 for future access to the northern portions of the A. Stubbs' property. The Planning Commission unanimously voted against this request. Members recommended that future access to the Stubbs' property should be either through an interior road access from Watertown Road or from the Stubbs' property to .he immediate north of this property. The Planning Commission also noted that if access to the north of the Stubbs' property was of concern, that it should have been addressed during the review of the Alan Carlson's 16 lot plat. Tom Barrett will be prepared to respond to any questions Council Members may have regarding use of road outlot extension within Rolling Meadows plat. If Council concurs with Planning Commission recommendation that Wear Lane North and Wear Circle be reclassified as public, the City staff must follow the defined process for classifying roads as public. The Planning Commission also approved the new owner's request to allow temporary access off of Old Crystal Bay Road North while existing residence is in use. At the time of new residential construction on the property, a driveway would be developed via the 25' outlot from the west. The Planning Commission wanted it to be specifically noted that Lot 2, Block 2's front yard was to be the west lot line. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the three lot plat. The enclosed preliminary subdivision approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's approval recommendation. Please review the enclosed staff memo dated May 15, 1990 for more background on issues raised with this current subdivision review.