Laserfiche WebLink
r- <br />tr' <br />ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 13, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE 11473-KELLY CONTINUED <br />discrepancy in the hardcover calculations. <br />Mabusth replied that it was the applicant's understanding <br />nat removal of landscaping would result in a 10% reduction in <br />i.-dcover. She stated that staff's calculations determined that <br />only a 5% reductif-n would occur. Mabusth said, "I would lik« r.he <br />opportunity tc *et again with the applicants to discuss the <br />hardcover <br />It was moved <br />Councilmember Goet* <br />4# Nays-0, Moti«> <br />by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />'.3 table application #1473. Motion, Ayes- <br />d. <br />#1506 CAROL SENN <br />3220 ffATERTOWN ROAD <br />FINAL SUBDIVISION <br />RESOLUTION #2844* <br />It was movedIt was movea by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />COu4«cilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2c44, approving the <br />Plat of Senn Orono Addition. Motion, Ayes-4, ?7?yc-0. Motion <br />passed. <br />#1509 EARL FREEMAN <br />NATBRTOIIN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />Mr. Freeman was not present <br />Bernhardson said, "Staff has reviewed the possible actions <br />that the City can take in relation to the free standing accessory <br />structure. We feel that it is appropria>s to grant a variance at <br />this point. Staff has determined chat since a principal <br />structure did exist on the property and that it was removed by a <br />hazardous building proceeding, we cannot remove the accessory <br />g^jfUQ-ture because it is legal non-conforming use. Approval of <br />a variance would allow .ae City to set the conditions under which <br />the structure can remain." <br />Counci Imeiaber Callahan indicated that he would not be in <br />favor of granting such a variance. <br />Mabusth asked City Attorney Barrett whether it would be <br />appropriate to require a cc^diticnai use permit to dea± with the <br />aspect of the legal non-conlc-ng structure. <br />City Attorney Barrett replied, "The non-conforming use <br />status arises either from the Constitution, because Freeman <br />has property that we cannot take, or from the recognition of such <br />uses within the City*s ordinances. The city has no provi^-^n to <br />license non-conforming uses. Granting a variance woulu vide <br />the City with a negotiating tool to assure that .. tain <br />improvements on the property occurred." <br />- 3 -