My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
12-10-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 11:25:16 AM
Creation date
2/25/2025 11:23:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
431
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />OROHO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 13, 1990 <br />Mayor Grabek asked Bellows what specific concerns the <br />Planning Commission has regarding the recent request. <br />Bellows replied, "We were assured that all trees that were <br />to be pres Lved would be clearly marked before work began on the <br />site. Th it is not being done. The Planning Commission is <br />concerned because trees cannot be replaced after-the-fact.’’ <br />Mayor Grabek asked staff tc review the concerns raised by <br />Bellows. He asked if the retention pond had been constructed in <br />a manner other than what the developer had proposed. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth replied, "The final seeding is <br />lacking from the retention pond area. However, the City did not <br />request the developer to provide plantings. The developer did <br />not provide much detail on the actual retention pond because it <br />was located within the commercial outlet set aside for future <br />development. The City did not expect the pond to be as large as <br />it is. The final plat approval only specified that the developer <br />provide ground cover around the retention pond. In fact. City <br />staff would discourage the use of plantings along one side <br />because of a sighting problem that may be created." <br />Gerhardson added, "The City has not completed its project <br />along the west end of the pond and that is contributing to the <br />unsightliness of the area." <br />It was moved by Councilmember v .iahan, seconded by <br />CounciImember Goetten, to table this . :em until the September 10, <br />1990 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. <br />»jl473 JRCQOBLni KBLLT <br />2054 8HAOTNDOD ROAD <br />ARBR-Tn-rACT VARZAHCB <br />RIQDBST TO TABLE <br />Bernhardson explained tnat due to the pending denial and a <br />discrepancy in the hardcover calculations, the applicant has <br />requested that this item be tabled. <br />Councilmember Callahan noted that this matter was first <br />presented some time ago. Re questioned why there is still a <br />- 2 - <br />ZONING FILE #1334-REBERS CONTINUED <br />to the Council the Planning Commission's concerns involved with <br />this request and asked that it be monitored closely. He <br />suggested that the resolution allowing any diversion from what <br />the City originally approved be very precise. Chairman Kelley <br />also asked that the Council, in dealing with this matter, once <br />again speak to the developer about the conditions at the corner <br />of Brown Road and Highway 12. The Planning Commission woult like <br />to see some kind of plantings or screening around the retention <br />pond.•
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.