Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER .2.^LE *1334-RraERS RECONSID^^TION^C^^^^^^^^^ <br />Goetten stated that *-hat he felt very strongly <br />:rtJse ^ftua"i:=^ns*:roJ;ra .evie-e. <br />hadthat <br />% <br />—.- , eai^ "'T'S^a VOt6 WaS SIX tOPlanning Conmiissioner Rowlet.e sa ‘ -^.^idually. The <br />on. in £a-%°^„„^reu''eve"d w^'woufd no-, he se.-v.ng onr purpose <br />Planning Commission." planning Cor,mission ■ s <br />Goetten stated be that this issue was not <br />recommendation. She However, the Plann;ng Cottraiission <br />considered fully by Mr. ”°”®aU of the aspects of this <br />Sorked very, very hard to ^ ^o.id be to allow the <br />unioue, sensitive parcel. ^uese case bv case and *eave the <br />Planning Commission '?ij^g''to’ see the Planning Commission make <br />decision there. ^ fchink they took ownership of t.,is <br />rurdi^trio^°a^a°? ruid UR; to support them." <br />Callahan stated a^s Tnow ^^nde^^^-d^U? <br />roust be provided fro-n a J'j tnake a change anyway, why is <br />C^SsJr. is going to be ^^“ffthlngr individually - <br />!rke!y.%hrtU-^rru;-d «iii be designed as the templates show. <br />Rowlette said. -- r^op^^eri^ e?ch ofthe^Y^ii^t-ll <br />3“!f; o< «„ <br />if the property staff to aIsLe that the driveway is <br />rt'ed’grviig^ =-\deVation Jto the th th; <br />“gu«ti%h^«“~tttr woull go before the Planning Commission. <br />Callahan asked «het^r "“^^^^‘’pre-determiL an acceptable <br />5°o-i!l^“"forthr^tIv:::a:Jl-orrach of ?he l. or . lots. <br />Rowlette replied, "I do not believe the Planning Commis <br />- 25 -