My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1990
>
12-10-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 11:25:16 AM
Creation date
2/25/2025 11:23:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
431
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L <br />ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 22, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1334-REBERS RECONSIDERATION CONTINUED <br />of 20 feet. The interior lots of the subdivision have such a <br />configuration ■ that it is impossible to provide a turn-around no <br />matter where the house is placed on the lot. Tnere can be no <br />loop or circular driveways, but a turn-around area is acceptable. <br />The turn-arounds will eliminate the need to back out unto the <br />street, which in some cases may prove to be very dangerous. Most <br />of the lots in this subdivision are heavily wooded, thus reducing <br />sight capabilities. The templates present three options for <br />providing a turn-around." <br />Mr. Kost used a sketch of the development plan and an actual <br />house footprint to support Mr. Pflaum's comments. <br />Mr, Pflaura said, "We have an economic problem if we are to <br />proceed with the recommendation of thi Planning Commission. This <br />subdivision is catering primarily to corporate transfer <br />executives that ha/e little time to go through a designing <br />process. They wish to be provided with a design and cost <br />estimate as quickly as possible. They need to know that they can <br />build the house design of their choice on the lot they have <br />chosen without delay. Mr. Rebers is competiig with other <br />subdivisions of this nature that exist in Minnetonka, Eden <br />Prairie and other suburbs. We are asking to be allowed to use <br />the templates in order to avoid the time delay of a review <br />process to determine whether a particular lot is buildable. If a <br />home buyer wishes to have a driveway design not represented by a <br />template. Planning Commission review would be required. <br />j retten asked how many lots would need this special driveway <br />consideration. <br />Mr. Kost replied, "Approximately 12 or 13 of the 25 lots <br />would need this special consideration." <br />Goetten asked Mr. Pflaum if he understands why the Planning <br />Commission has taken such a strong stand on this issue. <br />Mr. Pflaum replied, "Mr. Kelley told me that this <br />subdivision had special benefits included with it. It is the <br />only subdivision • in Orono that is less than two acres and has <br />sower and water. Mr. Kelley's point of view is that we <br />negotiate'*- the package and if wa did not give consideration to <br />the driveways ‘ at is our problem. He does not wish to see any <br />change in t^ ginal conditions. Mr. Kelley told me that I <br />could quote h 5 said that he and the Planning Commission had <br />walked the siL ..a saw the houses that were under construction. <br />Be was fully satisfied that a maximum effort is being made, more <br />than they had intended, in regard to tree and site preservation. <br />Mr. Kelley does not object to what we are proposing, except that <br />he wisiies to view each of these on a case by case basis." <br />- 24 - <br />(
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.