My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
11-26-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 2:34:53 PM
Creation date
2/21/2025 12:48:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L <br />Septic System Management Program <br />August 24, 1990 <br />Page 15 of 16 <br />Septic Systems as "Second Fiddle" <br />Most developers and many residents of Orono believe that <br />septic systems are a "second class citizen", and that ultimately <br />the City"of Orono will be sewered. There are certainly a number <br />of people who take the opposite view, that the City's stated <br />intent to "never sewer rural Orono", is a realistic, viable goal. <br />Given the tenor of the courts in limiting special assessments to <br />the equivalent increases in property value, it seems unlikely <br />that city sewers will run rampanc through our hills and valleys <br />for many years to come. Developers and home owners tend to place <br />septic systems low on a list of priorities, hence other factors <br />in development of a property are often given precedence. This <br />often results in less than perfect conditions for <br />designing/locating/constructing septic systems, and in probably <br />1/3 of the residential construction projects, the need for a <br />strong presence by City staff is critical in ensuring that septic <br />needs are properly met. The amount of staff time required to <br />"ride herd" on a project from beginning to completion, has <br />generally'exceeded that available, ever since the point at which <br />the City no longer had a staff person devoted full time to the <br />septic program. <br />Conclusions <br />1.Not enough time is being spent on followups to make sure all <br />failing systems get repaired. <br />2.Residents are not receiving the level of existing system <br />inspections that was originally anticipated and which is <br />required in order to limit the incidence of failed systems. <br />3.Septic system plan review, construction, inspection, and <br />followup documentation is receiving fragmented attention <br />from multiple staff members, with no one person <br />comprehensively overseeing the entire process. This leads <br />to a much higher potential that something can go wrong. <br />4.Record keeping has been inadequate due to a lack of staff <br />time devoted to same.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.