My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
11-26-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 2:34:53 PM
Creation date
2/21/2025 12:48:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
could do the following with those monies: <br />a. Place in the sewer fund for capital replacement <br />items in the future and thereby keep down the costs <br />of longterm operations for all sewered properties. <br />b. Designate the monies for specific repairs in this <br />area. <br />c. Determine a means to distribute those charges to <br />all the properties that were in the district as a <br />rebate. (It should be noted however, that not all <br />the persons who paid the amount are the residents <br />there at present.) <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Accept the information. <br />2. Indicate any further issues. <br />3. Give staff direction as to further proceeding on this matter. <br />4. Indicate direction they desire in dealing with precedence. <br />5. Determine direction for use of the charges. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended after Council has considered <br />these items that if it is appropriate staff be directed to work <br />with the Country Club to determine if a connection charge is <br />appropriate and that as it is a property in another city that <br />the issue of precedence may only be applicable for the few <br />properties previously excluded from the project. As for use of <br />any connection charges at least from this connection that they be <br />used for future operation maintenance costs. This would keep the <br />overall maintenance for this sewered properties lower as these <br />properties are no further ahead financially if Country Club <br />doesn't connect that they would be if they did connect. <br />Additionally it creates no negative impact on the system and the <br />Country Club was never contemplated in the original as'^essment. <br />A different story may be for those individual properties that <br />could have gone on the project and thereby lower the original <br />assessment, but chose not to. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council <br />give direction to staff regarding whether they should proceed <br />with working to develop sewer connection on this property. Ayes <br />_, Nays _. <br />cc: Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road, Wayzata <br />Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.