Laserfiche WebLink
.IINUTES OF THE REJULAR ORCNO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 27, 1986MAYOR'S REPORT:.Mayer Bugler had r.cthir.g to r^rert <br />CAALE TV REPORT: <br />REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN SYSTEM OWNER* , <br />It was moved by Council member Frahm, secondeo .y <br />Counci Inember Adams, to accept the information •. r . m <br />staff regardii - the pending cable TV ownership cha.'.ge. <br />Motion, Ayes Nays 0. <br />fCITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />NORTH BROWN ROAD PETITION CounciImo.ber <br />Callaha.., to acce, t;ie petition from the North Brewn <br />Road residents, include it in the Highway 12 input and <br />schedule the subject for the Council meeting on November <br />24, 1986 to determine if speed limit enforcement, has had <br />significant impac^ on the problem. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays <br />0. <br />BIG ISLAND BO^dElD OP GOVERNORS*It was moved by CounciImember Frahm, seconded by <br />Counci 1memoer Adams, to table this matter until the <br />November 10, 1986 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays <br />0. <br />JOSEPH MIMMS - <br />APPEAL OP ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION <br />Joseph Mimms, <br />matter. <br />Brown Road South was present for this <br />City Admin .^.ac.>r Bernhardson explained thi matter in <br />w *ch Joseph Mimms is appealing the Administrator s <br />decision requiring surveys on all properties when <br />requesting a building permit when such a -urvey is not <br />on file. This policy has been in ef with-u <br />exception since July 1986 in order • <br />problems of location of structures, <br />surveys have pr^^iously been required <br />80-85% of v-iilding permit application;, <br />not alreo.'.y on file. He explained -.a <br />requesting that this requirement k* ’-'r <br />particular -e becai v The propose..; <br />constructed . .i the si - of a demolished . <br />probably well within the required side yard, and rear <br />setbacks . <br />May r Butlti suggested that the City adopt a p>. icy that <br />whei the property exceeds the required area in the zone <br />in which it lies, and reasonable satisfaction is given <br />that the propos building doe£ not encroach into the <br />tck, a survey eed not be required. <br />•y <br />■y is <br />.ihm** .s <br />■»Q this <br />4- i.t to be <br />3.1,<r and. is