My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
11-13-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2025 9:50:35 AM
Creation date
2/18/2025 9:48:42 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
438
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bf <br />ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 22, 1990 <br />LMCD REPORT CONTINUED <br />Arndorfer's comments, I am not sure." <br />JoEilen stated that she would not be able to attend the <br />meeting on October 24th. <br />Mayor Grabek asked JoEllen what the City needs to do in <br />light of her absence. <br />JoEllen replied, "A representative from the City could <br />attend the meeting, but cannot vote. They can speak on the <br />City * s behalf. ' <br />Callahan stated that he would like <br />Administrator attend the meeting. <br />have the City <br />Mayor Grabek asked JoEllen for her opinion on what action <br />may be taken at that meeting. <br />JoEllen replied, "I believe that the Plan will be passed. <br />The thirty-day delay was not long enough to accomplish anything <br />given the magnitude of issues. I don't believe there will be <br />another delay." <br />Mayor Grabek asked if there were any additional cities that <br />have chosen to oppose the Plan along with Orono. <br />JoEllen replied, "As far as I know, Orono, Spring Park, and <br />Vi?ayzata are the only cities voting no." <br />Nettles stated that having input regarding the Shoreland <br />Management Regulations done at the Comprehensive Plan level was a <br />positive step toward developing a working relationship. He asked <br />what happens once the Plan is approved by the LMCD Board. <br />JoEllen replied, "The Plan is submitted to the Metropolitan <br />Council and I do not believe they will oppose it." <br />Goetten asked how long the Metropolitan Council may take to <br />review the Plan. <br />JoEllen replied, "They are allowed 90 days to review the <br />Plan. However, they may not take that long." <br />Callahan said, "This is a real mess. First of all, the LMCD <br />has assured everyone that this is only a plan. So voting no or <br />yes, makes no difference to anyone except for moral suasion. <br />Secondly, it was apparent to me from the meeting of October 10, <br />that this, particularly the Shoreland Management, is a DNR <br />operation and the LMCD is there to carry out whatever the DNR <br />wants done. The DNR is confused by it all because they expected <br />that they would have unanimous consent of the cities. If they do <br />- 20 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.