My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2025 11:17:13 AM
Creation date
2/10/2025 11:15:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 15, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1408-SMITH BAY MARINA CONTINUED <br />signage and landscaping. Mabusth replied that the proposal was <br />included in the Planning Commission packets. She added that <br />there would be no plantings in the 10 ’ buffer area due to sight <br />distance problems it may create. She suggested that the <br />applicant provide an updated plan showing the exact location of <br />the seawall and the proposed landscaping. <br />Chairman Kelley inquired as to the curb cuts off of County <br />Road 15. Mabusth said that only two would remain and added that <br />the entire parking area would be blacktopped. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows expressed her desire to see an <br />updated site plan. The applicant replied that they would work <br />with the City to achieve satisfactory landscaping results. Ke <br />further stated that he would prefer to keep any plantings from <br />the edge of Shoreline Drive. <br />Chairman Kelley questioned whether allowing parking in the <br />municipal lot would not create a pedestrian safety problem. Mr. <br />Toberman replied that there should not b*- any overflow from the <br />main parking lot. Council Representati e Callahan, suggested <br />that the aspect of municipal parking should not in any way be <br />tied into this application. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows indicated that she was in <br />favor of the improvements proposed for this property. She was <br />concerned about the status of site plan. Mabusth replied that a <br />planting schedule would be tied into the landscaping plan. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Bellows, to recommend approval as follows: <br />1. Approval of the lakeshore setback variance of 25'; <br />2. appr*^val of the deck structure connection to existing <br />dock variance of 75'; <br />3. approval of the principal structure side setback to a <br />residential use variance of 10'; <br />4. approval of the hardcover reduction within 0-75' setback <br />area to 63.4% and no change in the 75-250' setback area; <br />5. approval of a lot area variance of 1.3 acres; <br />6. approval of side setback variance for parking from <br />street lot line of 20'; <br />7. approval of a parking stall variance of 6 stalls; and <br />8. approval of setback variance from lakeshore for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.